Maybe but cost-amount isn't always tied to quality reasons, because there are different reasons to get something. Even though it cost pretty much the same as Frozen, I can't say "It's worth buying that instead" when I may personality like the other more, regardless of the quality. Besides, it's still a very cheap price to me a little, like it probably wouldn't matter, especially if each was only $1.00.
I can understand if people were more trying to spend money only for "high quality" movies maybe though.
Say another example is that a rare video game was much lower, but it cost a lot because of it being rare and a lost gem, even though the quality was very low in comparison.
Maybe but cost-amount isn't always tied to quality reasons, because there are different reasons to get something. Even though it cost pretty much the same as Frozen, I can't say "It's worth buying that instead" when I may personality like the other more, regardless of the quality. Besides, it's still a very cheap price to me a little, like it probably wouldn't matter, especially if each was only $1.00.
I can understand if people were more trying to spend money only for "high quality" movies maybe though.
Say another example is that a rare video game was much lower, but it cost a lot because of it being rare and a lost gem, even though the quality was very low in comparison.
Account abandoned and probably will make a new anonymous account with no trace of evidence of it being me. I think it's justified.