From all of the news and comments here, it looks like his computer was found by the Arizona police to have explicit photographs or videos of child pornography on it. There is even doubt whether the pictures were uploaded onto his computer by him, or by someone else without his knowledge. Despite this, Arizona law makes him guilty of "Sexual Exploitation of a Minor". That may be legal, but it does not sound like justice to me. Who is/are the minor(s) that he sexually exploited? Have whoever took the photographs been apprehended?
From all of the news and comments here, it looks like his computer was found by the Arizona police to have explicit photographs or videos of child pornography on it. There is even doubt whether the pictures were uploaded onto his computer by him, or by someone else without his knowledge. Despite this, Arizona law makes him guilty of "Sexual Exploitation of a Minor". That may be legal, but it does not sound like justice to me. Who is/are the minor(s) that he sexually exploited? Have whoever took the photographs been apprehended?
Fred Patten