No, that's not what I meant. Doing thing differently to Disney is fine. It's when you are actually trying to be like Disney but failing that there's an issue. :-)
In truth, what's at issue most here is the quality, and you can't really expect Disney quality on a Costco budget. It may not be entirely fair to compare such movies. And yet, if they're being offered at the same price . . .
I was thinking mostly of the part where they released from the vine; the movement seemed off. There were a few other instances where movement was linear, like they'd just said "go from point A to point B" without considering acceleration. This didn't happen so much with the motion of the wolves, that looked pretty good. There were also little details like the quality of mouth texture and motion. They would have been great ten years ago (at least for CGI), but now they stick out.
No, that's not what I meant. Doing thing differently to Disney is fine. It's when you are actually trying to be like Disney but failing that there's an issue. :-)
In truth, what's at issue most here is the quality, and you can't really expect Disney quality on a Costco budget. It may not be entirely fair to compare such movies. And yet, if they're being offered at the same price . . .
I was thinking mostly of the part where they released from the vine; the movement seemed off. There were a few other instances where movement was linear, like they'd just said "go from point A to point B" without considering acceleration. This didn't happen so much with the motion of the wolves, that looked pretty good. There were also little details like the quality of mouth texture and motion. They would have been great ten years ago (at least for CGI), but now they stick out.