There is this giant walking mouse, that even talks, and millions love him, but looks nothing like a mouse on this world. Same with a tall dog that seems pretty, funny.
I don't want to break the wheel for you but getting rid of biased arguments, I think the wolves looks great as a anthro style or some design, it seems odd to bring out "real wolves" when nearly every single "cartoon" (Sometimes non-cartoon) creation had done this before.
Also I think the graphics were basically different because they were trying to use a "fur" effect, though I thought they did that in the first?
There is this giant walking mouse, that even talks, and millions love him, but looks nothing like a mouse on this world. Same with a tall dog that seems pretty, funny.
I don't want to break the wheel for you but getting rid of biased arguments, I think the wolves looks great as a anthro style or some design, it seems odd to bring out "real wolves" when nearly every single "cartoon" (Sometimes non-cartoon) creation had done this before.
Also I think the graphics were basically different because they were trying to use a "fur" effect, though I thought they did that in the first?
Account abandoned and probably will make a new anonymous account with no trace of evidence of it being me. I think it's justified.