At least you didn't apologize that much that time.
I'm not sure this is a good place to reasonably argue against furry "haters," since we're all furries here. You can't argue against haters if you're not arguing with haters. This is what I mean when I say I don't think we're not even on the same side.
I'm not arguing against dialogue against furry haters; rather the opposite, in fact. I agree you can reasonably argue with haters. My point is that you have to at least understand where they are coming from; it is a common furry argument that "haters" (wish we were using another word, but whatever) cannot be argued with because they bring nothing of value to the conversation.
I'm just saying haters have valid reasons for their hate; calling them "ants that beneath me" (like CraftyAndy did) is unfair, wrong, and also kind of a dick move. The answer to hate shouldn't be more hate.
At least you didn't apologize that much that time.
I'm not sure this is a good place to reasonably argue against furry "haters," since we're all furries here. You can't argue against haters if you're not arguing with haters. This is what I mean when I say I don't think we're not even on the same side.
I'm not arguing against dialogue against furry haters; rather the opposite, in fact. I agree you can reasonably argue with haters. My point is that you have to at least understand where they are coming from; it is a common furry argument that "haters" (wish we were using another word, but whatever) cannot be argued with because they bring nothing of value to the conversation.
I'm just saying haters have valid reasons for their hate; calling them "ants that beneath me" (like CraftyAndy did) is unfair, wrong, and also kind of a dick move. The answer to hate shouldn't be more hate.