Actually, I'm glad you brought up the Anthrocon example. Flayrah's staff (or GreenReaper, if you prefer ;) ) has deliberately been silent on some points of that story. So there's definitely some editorial discrimination (the good kind) here.
Some parties think he was too vocal in posting that story -- and he's paid for it, personally. It's also a thorough, thoughtful, and well-researched story. I think it's a shining example of why good journalism is important -- even if it makes your friends look bad.
Actually, I'm glad you brought up the Anthrocon example. Flayrah's staff (or GreenReaper, if you prefer ;) ) has deliberately been silent on some points of that story. So there's definitely some editorial discrimination (the good kind) here.
Some parties think he was too vocal in posting that story -- and he's paid for it, personally. It's also a thorough, thoughtful, and well-researched story. I think it's a shining example of why good journalism is important -- even if it makes your friends look bad.