Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

That's probably why it isn't tagged or titled as a review. Like other con reports, it covers only those events which the reporter attended and feels qualified to speak of.

The problem with everyone posting such material only to their own journals is that it becomes very hard to find it as a source; on FA, it is almost impossible. WikiFur's list of convention resources is spottily updated; there are currently zero reports of Anthrocon 2012, an event five times the size of Califur, while What The Fur 2012 (attendance: 282) has six.

I'd encourage those with their own perspectives of Califur 9 to contribute them as a story or in the comments and/or link them on WikiFur.

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.