Thanks for the links. I think you're right. But even in the case of the HIV article, I wasn't really adding anything in my post here on Flayrah: it was just a link to [a][s] and a couple of comments to put it in some context.
I think Rakuen's comment (from the other thread you linked to) is about right: there's not much value in simply linking and quoting.
Thanks for the links. I think you're right. But even in the case of the HIV article, I wasn't really adding anything in my post here on Flayrah: it was just a link to [a][s] and a couple of comments to put it in some context.
I think Rakuen's comment (from the other thread you linked to) is about right: there's not much value in simply linking and quoting.
I have no doubt that the occasional [a][s] article might be considered newsworthy in its own right. They would probably more likely to be those written by our higher-profile contributors, like Phil Geusz (maybe his recent one giving advice to first-time conventions, or his struggle to get mainstream publishers to take furry books seriously).