Looking at the piece, while there was some mild criticism of [a][s], it wasn't directed towards the mention of the article. You may be thinking of this (and this comment), which was a more straightforward case of "link and quote".
Flayrah took a while to gain contributors after its relaunch. If you compare 2010, 2011 and 2012, there's a clear progression. I think we had a lot of good content in every year, but our style of coverage has broadened.
Looking at the piece, while there was some mild criticism of [a][s], it wasn't directed towards the mention of the article. You may be thinking of this (and this comment), which was a more straightforward case of "link and quote".
Flayrah took a while to gain contributors after its relaunch. If you compare 2010, 2011 and 2012, there's a clear progression. I think we had a lot of good content in every year, but our style of coverage has broadened.