Please quote back where it says in the article or any of the referenced material, "you can't do something if anyone anywhere will be offended by it".
This is very specifically about cultural appropriation so I'm not exactly sure why you're making that leap of logic. Well, I mean, I could guess: perhaps to support an untenable point?
If that was all you got out of the article, well, I suppose there wasn't much point in my asking you to read it, was there? I don't know if the font was changed for any particular reason, nor what the new font is, but I know what it isn't.
One of the points of this is that there ISN'T a very clear standard for wrongness and rightness. You actually have to think about it. I know it's easier to just follow a formula, but this actually requires some analysis and a thoughtful approach.
Please quote back where it says in the article or any of the referenced material, "you can't do something if anyone anywhere will be offended by it".
This is very specifically about cultural appropriation so I'm not exactly sure why you're making that leap of logic. Well, I mean, I could guess: perhaps to support an untenable point?
If that was all you got out of the article, well, I suppose there wasn't much point in my asking you to read it, was there? I don't know if the font was changed for any particular reason, nor what the new font is, but I know what it isn't.
One of the points of this is that there ISN'T a very clear standard for wrongness and rightness. You actually have to think about it. I know it's easier to just follow a formula, but this actually requires some analysis and a thoughtful approach.