Nope, that won't work after you've been prompted to explain what exactly the standard is for being inoffensive. The expectation that nobody anywhere can be offended ever deserves no respect. The onus is on you to explain what these individuals did wrong by using a font commonly and non-problematically used by restaurants across north america.
Oh yes, i read the linked article and any reasonable person can ignore the linking of a font to a murder (as if a single bar fight in the most messed up part of the country is a bellwether for society, ha.)
This article also fails to give any substance to its criticism by telling us what is the alternate font, was it changed for any particular reason, and why is it better. Making it little more than a petty whine.
Nope, that won't work after you've been prompted to explain what exactly the standard is for being inoffensive. The expectation that nobody anywhere can be offended ever deserves no respect. The onus is on you to explain what these individuals did wrong by using a font commonly and non-problematically used by restaurants across north america.
Oh yes, i read the linked article and any reasonable person can ignore the linking of a font to a murder (as if a single bar fight in the most messed up part of the country is a bellwether for society, ha.)
This article also fails to give any substance to its criticism by telling us what is the alternate font, was it changed for any particular reason, and why is it better. Making it little more than a petty whine.