I don't agree it's about the whole fandom. Honestly, I think that is stereotype and just rude to say we need judgement to the whole thing just because quality is all around or it's a "threat" or "uncaring". I'm sorry, but I think it's just closed and linear to not accept others drawings just because it's not quality or "doesn't" improve the fandom, and say we need to judge them anyway. Not everyone want's there's "improved", and it's not every painting is meant to be "improved". And I think it's just wrong to suggest judging to the whole thing when others are not about the quality anyway. Also, I highly disagree that it's a threat to art or a problem. Because creation isn't about quality all the time.
About every art having the possibility of "higher" quality, I don't think all art is meant to be. Especially if it's supposed to be a crappy joke of some random drawing. But even if it did apply, that doesn't mean we need criticism to people who limit there qualities or not do anything about it. In other words: Only part of the fandom needs this; for those who want the judgement.
Also, I think some pictures for practice for Quality can improve already, even the non-Quality purpose ones. Because pictures isn't always about it.
Edit: If this article was also saying that the ratings for other purpose works other than quality doesn't deserve Equal ratings, then I find that offensive because I think ratings once again can be about other things, like for the likes of jokes, theories, etc. Oh and more to your comment again, I think the ratings system still has a point.. Because the ratings were probably meant for interest and guess what, interest is not only about quality only. I think it's just linear bad to suggest to rate others down just because it wasn't about quality. I think ratings is meant for interest of anything than just quality themes.
Also, on the last part of what you said. Yeah I was thinking something like that but wasn't so sure.
I don't agree it's about the whole fandom. Honestly, I think that is stereotype and just rude to say we need judgement to the whole thing just because quality is all around or it's a "threat" or "uncaring". I'm sorry, but I think it's just closed and linear to not accept others drawings just because it's not quality or "doesn't" improve the fandom, and say we need to judge them anyway. Not everyone want's there's "improved", and it's not every painting is meant to be "improved". And I think it's just wrong to suggest judging to the whole thing when others are not about the quality anyway. Also, I highly disagree that it's a threat to art or a problem. Because creation isn't about quality all the time.
About every art having the possibility of "higher" quality, I don't think all art is meant to be. Especially if it's supposed to be a crappy joke of some random drawing. But even if it did apply, that doesn't mean we need criticism to people who limit there qualities or not do anything about it. In other words: Only part of the fandom needs this; for those who want the judgement.
Also, I think some pictures for practice for Quality can improve already, even the non-Quality purpose ones. Because pictures isn't always about it.
Edit: If this article was also saying that the ratings for other purpose works other than quality doesn't deserve Equal ratings, then I find that offensive because I think ratings once again can be about other things, like for the likes of jokes, theories, etc. Oh and more to your comment again, I think the ratings system still has a point.. Because the ratings were probably meant for interest and guess what, interest is not only about quality only. I think it's just linear bad to suggest to rate others down just because it wasn't about quality. I think ratings is meant for interest of anything than just quality themes.
Also, on the last part of what you said. Yeah I was thinking something like that but wasn't so sure.
I wrote a lot again, I know.
Account abandoned and probably will make a new anonymous account with no trace of evidence of it being me. I think it's justified.