Clearly they are looking to go after FA's userbase, not Inkbunny's. The history with the staff and founder is with FA. If you're going to go after FA's userbase, then you have to keep cub porn out of it.
Now would the site have as much of a reputation as Inkbunny for cub porn if they allowed it? I don't think so, cubs are probably quite content at Inkbunny so I don't see a major rush to put their stuff on a second site like they were with Inkbunny. However, it is kind of a unfortunate truth that the reason that Inkbunny won't replace FA is the chunk of the fanbase that will not go on a site where there are cubs. So if they're target is FA, they are probably going to be mostly like FA, minus Dragoneer and staff.
Clearly they are looking to go after FA's userbase, not Inkbunny's. The history with the staff and founder is with FA. If you're going to go after FA's userbase, then you have to keep cub porn out of it.
Now would the site have as much of a reputation as Inkbunny for cub porn if they allowed it? I don't think so, cubs are probably quite content at Inkbunny so I don't see a major rush to put their stuff on a second site like they were with Inkbunny. However, it is kind of a unfortunate truth that the reason that Inkbunny won't replace FA is the chunk of the fanbase that will not go on a site where there are cubs. So if they're target is FA, they are probably going to be mostly like FA, minus Dragoneer and staff.