>One potential way to satisfy both audiences would be to split the feed into two groups, or maybe even two sites or pages; one strictly for furry news, the other for furry perspectives on non-furry news.
This is nonsense. What does "furry perspective on non-furry news" even mean? Is Flayrah going to run news about Mexican drug cartels because there happen to be a few Mexican furs who have opinions about them? Environment news because some furs are environmentalists? Tech news because many furs work in the tech industry?
Please let's accept reality: the experiment of allowing opinion pieces about RL politics on Flayrah was a failure and needs to be killed off immediately before it does actual damage.
Allowing off-topic news and highly controversial political pamphlets has historically been the beginning of the end for a lot of fanzines and magazines, it feels like a last resort to grab the readers attention when the magazine has nothing on-topic to offer any more. Flayrah does its job very well and doesn't need to play attention whoring like that, nor it needs to be poisoned by even more explicit political rivalry between staff people or writers.
>One potential way to satisfy both audiences would be to split the feed into two groups, or maybe even two sites or pages; one strictly for furry news, the other for furry perspectives on non-furry news.
This is nonsense. What does "furry perspective on non-furry news" even mean? Is Flayrah going to run news about Mexican drug cartels because there happen to be a few Mexican furs who have opinions about them? Environment news because some furs are environmentalists? Tech news because many furs work in the tech industry?
Please let's accept reality: the experiment of allowing opinion pieces about RL politics on Flayrah was a failure and needs to be killed off immediately before it does actual damage.
Allowing off-topic news and highly controversial political pamphlets has historically been the beginning of the end for a lot of fanzines and magazines, it feels like a last resort to grab the readers attention when the magazine has nothing on-topic to offer any more. Flayrah does its job very well and doesn't need to play attention whoring like that, nor it needs to be poisoned by even more explicit political rivalry between staff people or writers.