Wow, like debating a Scientologist when you question their fundamental illogic and they scream back at you "WIFE-BEATER!"
Same to you by the way. You offer the above argument from intimidation (a fallacy identified by Ayn Rand) in response to me questioning your fundamental illogic.
But I suppose I should make this clear. When I say "freedom", I mean "freedom from coercion". You seem to mean "freedom from inconvenience" or "freedom from want". Effectively, "freedom to have what I want". Which is a violation of the freedoms of the people who have to provide you the things that you're "free to be given".
Freedom and entitlement are opposites. Liberty/Freedom and Free Markets go hand in hand.
Same to you by the way. You offer the above argument from intimidation (a fallacy identified by Ayn Rand) in response to me questioning your fundamental illogic.
But I suppose I should make this clear. When I say "freedom", I mean "freedom from coercion". You seem to mean "freedom from inconvenience" or "freedom from want". Effectively, "freedom to have what I want". Which is a violation of the freedoms of the people who have to provide you the things that you're "free to be given".
Freedom and entitlement are opposites. Liberty/Freedom and Free Markets go hand in hand.