I could make a TL;DR, but I think the best way to approach this and to note an interesting hy in the argument you made here:
"People are one staring Fred because of the actions of Flayrah! That's not fair to him!"
"I wrote an article that was ranking Brave low because of the actions of Pixar. That's my job."
In other words, you both promote and demote letting the actions of a larger group influence one's view of the individual work in the same comment.
Now I think it was more Fred's wording saying "Well, this isn't really furry" to start with rather then the other articles that caused the down-voting. I think many of our readers are smart enough to discern that Fred had nothing to do with the controversy.
The start of an article should sell the product. If the reader rejects the product take it as a lesson rather then a rejection. Enjoy your break.
I could make a TL;DR, but I think the best way to approach this and to note an interesting hy in the argument you made here:
"People are one staring Fred because of the actions of Flayrah! That's not fair to him!"
"I wrote an article that was ranking Brave low because of the actions of Pixar. That's my job."
In other words, you both promote and demote letting the actions of a larger group influence one's view of the individual work in the same comment.
Now I think it was more Fred's wording saying "Well, this isn't really furry" to start with rather then the other articles that caused the down-voting. I think many of our readers are smart enough to discern that Fred had nothing to do with the controversy.
The start of an article should sell the product. If the reader rejects the product take it as a lesson rather then a rejection. Enjoy your break.