"Good enough" doesn't convey anything beyond that you would read it again, and since I don't know what your standards are, it is pretty meaningless to me. I, also, do not know what "Best of Show" is beyond it being a compiled book.
That leaves "an adventure of great scope" and "an intriguing setting." Neither of those things really tell me if it is a good book. For instance, I could have my 7 year old niece write a book about the Roman Emperor Hadrian which would include "an adventure of great scope" and "an intriguing setting," but it wouldn't be worth reading.
The only reason I brought this up is that I have bought several books after reading your reviews. Several of the books contained good concepts, stories, and characters that praised the books for, but you didn't mention when they fell apart (quite badly) in execution.
"Good enough" doesn't convey anything beyond that you would read it again, and since I don't know what your standards are, it is pretty meaningless to me. I, also, do not know what "Best of Show" is beyond it being a compiled book.
That leaves "an adventure of great scope" and "an intriguing setting." Neither of those things really tell me if it is a good book. For instance, I could have my 7 year old niece write a book about the Roman Emperor Hadrian which would include "an adventure of great scope" and "an intriguing setting," but it wouldn't be worth reading.
The only reason I brought this up is that I have bought several books after reading your reviews. Several of the books contained good concepts, stories, and characters that praised the books for, but you didn't mention when they fell apart (quite badly) in execution.