The logic has to be along the lines of don't feed the bears; this particular bear now associates people with food, in theory.
Accept now this guy "has a taste for manflesh" which is of course preposterous; we can't taste that much different than any other mostly decomposed roadkill after a certain point.
Of course, the destruction of the bear, or any problem animal, is not about wrongdoing, either. Guy thinks the bear's a threat to human lives, so he puts it down. Terribly unfair.
The logic has to be along the lines of don't feed the bears; this particular bear now associates people with food, in theory.
Accept now this guy "has a taste for manflesh" which is of course preposterous; we can't taste that much different than any other mostly decomposed roadkill after a certain point.
Of course, the destruction of the bear, or any problem animal, is not about wrongdoing, either. Guy thinks the bear's a threat to human lives, so he puts it down. Terribly unfair.