Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

That's true if you say that "keeping a tiger" means keeping it without ANY security measures or proper training. Of course I agree that the case you're describing should be avoided.

But that kind of matter is TOTALLY independant from whether the animal involved is exotic or not. It's a matter of responsibility, and it's true for any kind of potentially dangerous animal, domestic or not - the list of casualities involving dogs has been posted here earlier.

Sure, compared to the average dog, the average tiger has a much higher potential to cause havoc if you don't take the proper precautions. But then, the case you are describing above is a special case.

It's not like everyone keeping exotics is a complete and utter moron. It's not some kind of law of nature that you can't properly care for a tiger unless you're the employee of a zoo.

So, there should definitely be laws or guidelines to define some minimum standards. And there are, in most places over here at least.

What I really don't like is this call for taking away people's freedoms to willingly take risks and responsibilities upon themselves, assuming they're all stupid. I know that's pretty much the american way, "beware, hot coffee may be hot", but that doesn't mean we shouldn't sometimes question it.

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.