Those distinctions don't fit in any widely accepted definition of furry. They couldn't because they meaningless in a lot of art, the main medium of the furry fandom. If you just have a picture of an anthropomorphic fox then almost any fur would be happy to claim that it's furry without pestering the artist for information on how other species would have looked if they had been included or what the character's diet and mannerisms are like.
I didn't say that most furries preferred a specific type of anthropomorphism, I said that they preferred an anthropomorphic character to one which is not.
"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~
Those distinctions don't fit in any widely accepted definition of furry. They couldn't because they meaningless in a lot of art, the main medium of the furry fandom. If you just have a picture of an anthropomorphic fox then almost any fur would be happy to claim that it's furry without pestering the artist for information on how other species would have looked if they had been included or what the character's diet and mannerisms are like.
I didn't say that most furries preferred a specific type of anthropomorphism, I said that they preferred an anthropomorphic character to one which is not.
"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~