I'm sure if the 15 year old lied about their age or never specified their age that would have been the FIRST thing the defense used. If not then Mr. Sad Panda had a really terrible lawyer, and that would be his fault for getting bad representation. I mean, it'd certainly be more relevant to his defense then his definition of a furry, which is not only irrelevant but does make him sound like a sexual deviant. If I were his lawyer I would have told him to keep that under his hat.
I'm sure if the 15 year old lied about their age or never specified their age that would have been the FIRST thing the defense used. If not then Mr. Sad Panda had a really terrible lawyer, and that would be his fault for getting bad representation. I mean, it'd certainly be more relevant to his defense then his definition of a furry, which is not only irrelevant but does make him sound like a sexual deviant. If I were his lawyer I would have told him to keep that under his hat.