I would consider works separately. We have seen quite recently that one work in a series may be significantly less furry than the others. When anthropomorphic characters are not the focus of a series, it's quite likely that even if one features them, others will not.
So the answer to your question is no, the presence of anthropomorphic animals in one Bond movie does not make the entire series furry. Compare this with the Redwall universe, where it would be extremely difficult to write a non-furry story.
Also, I am somewhat dubious of werewolves as furry, because they tend to be humans who gain animal characteristics (zoomorphic) rather than animals who gain human characteristics (anthropomoprhic).
I would consider works separately. We have seen quite recently that one work in a series may be significantly less furry than the others. When anthropomorphic characters are not the focus of a series, it's quite likely that even if one features them, others will not.
So the answer to your question is no, the presence of anthropomorphic animals in one Bond movie does not make the entire series furry. Compare this with the Redwall universe, where it would be extremely difficult to write a non-furry story.
Also, I am somewhat dubious of werewolves as furry, because they tend to be humans who gain animal characteristics (zoomorphic) rather than animals who gain human characteristics (anthropomoprhic).