Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

This is the first one using stats. I don't want to see FA go, I want to see it improve. There's a big difference. You can perhaps see my articles as biased against FA but I would say they aren't. What they do do is point out FA's failings. That's not biased or opinion, that's fact. FA has not been able to deliver and has been criticised heavily. I was worried about seeming anti-FA and did ask some other people if they knew of any major complaints against IB and SF leadership but no one could think of any. Just that I need to ask about other sites when I can name a number of complaints against FA offhand shows something about that.

I'm glad you see the difference and I hope Dragoneer does. I assume he's at least read the article but even if he hasn't I think he is aware of all the problems in FA and I do think the "joining forces" with Furocity is meant to solve those problems. Perhaps this is all too soon to be commented on but, as far as I can see, the development issue is the major problem with FA and the one about which's solutions I've heard the least.

"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.