Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

"I got a reply from Dragoneer. He doesn't want to comment because he says Flayrah is biased against FA."

And furries all fuck in suit... right?

What I mean by that is that sure, there are some members here who certainly may have vendettas against FA, particularly when this is the second article you have written this summer to 'statistically compare' FA to its competitors, the first one not really hiding your thoughts on FA's behavior. And by your history of comments on this site I think there are clear motives as to why you would certainly not mind seeing FA, or the people running it, go. So if Dragoneer thinks Flayrah is biased because of the article of a few of its members, that's his prerogative, but that would also mean FA is 'anti-FA' because of people's similar criticisms on his own site.

I think it's important for a leader to understand the difference between legitimate concern and sabotage. Clearly, I don't see yourself having any love for FA's policies, but I really hope that Dragoneer does take this information and use it for the advantage of his site rather then dismissing its entirety purely on the fact of the hand/hands that wrote it. I know he listens even if he doesn't always speak.

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.