Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

I get that you're not making value judgements by dividing a group of people into sub-groups.

Unfortunately, you divided a group of people into sub-groups based on factors that have been a divisive issue with that group in the past. Then you released this information to us and asked us to fill out another survey. I know reading through the results of the prior survey minutes before I took the next totally colored my responses. I should have known better, but, you know what, so should you.

Why are you trying to inform furries about furries, anyway? We're furries. We kind of already know what we do. Yes, it was fun reading the results of the survey, but, if you really want to inform "the scientific literature" those results were something I should not have known about.

Your study is affecting what you are studying much more than I think you are aware.

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.