*nods* Understandable; your quibble with the question is a valid one. While I can't say what precisely we were looking for with the question (because there may be people who read this before taking the survey), I can say that your concerns are issues we've taken into question, and that, given the nature of the hypothesis we're testing with the question, that issue is not a serious problem for the validity of the question. I'd be happy to talk about it more in a one-to-one e-mail. But I would rather not talk about it in a forum >.>'
As always, thank you for your guys' interest in the research; Sonious, thank you for your honest opinion regarding the survey, and it means a lot to me that you speak well of the survey, despite the fact that it, like all surveys, is not a perfect instrument =)
*nods* Understandable; your quibble with the question is a valid one. While I can't say what precisely we were looking for with the question (because there may be people who read this before taking the survey), I can say that your concerns are issues we've taken into question, and that, given the nature of the hypothesis we're testing with the question, that issue is not a serious problem for the validity of the question. I'd be happy to talk about it more in a one-to-one e-mail. But I would rather not talk about it in a forum >.>'
As always, thank you for your guys' interest in the research; Sonious, thank you for your honest opinion regarding the survey, and it means a lot to me that you speak well of the survey, despite the fact that it, like all surveys, is not a perfect instrument =)