Assuming what you say is true, there is no randomness to it, as you've been arguing. And, I'd like to see some scientific back up for the notion that a German Shepherd is large enough to take a human. The evidence of my eyes says that's bull.
Also, damage isn't limited to what can happen to the animal. The dangers to humans, as outlined on the page below, are nothing that should be taken as casually as you seem to. Obviously the probability that either the animal or the human will sustain damage is pretty high.
And though you might say that the probability of having an accident on the road is not great enough to stop people from driving, I think most would agree that daring to drive drunk unnecessarily increases your odds of a life altering mishap. In other words, it all boils down to responsibility, or lack thereof.
Assuming what you say is true, there is no randomness to it, as you've been arguing. And, I'd like to see some scientific back up for the notion that a German Shepherd is large enough to take a human. The evidence of my eyes says that's bull.
Also, damage isn't limited to what can happen to the animal. The dangers to humans, as outlined on the page below, are nothing that should be taken as casually as you seem to. Obviously the probability that either the animal or the human will sustain damage is pretty high.
And though you might say that the probability of having an accident on the road is not great enough to stop people from driving, I think most would agree that daring to drive drunk unnecessarily increases your odds of a life altering mishap. In other words, it all boils down to responsibility, or lack thereof.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia_and_health