That's a pretty good argument however, it falls on the idea that ALL humans believe in those things, or don't get "up tight" when those things happen to animals.
There are many human organizations against the mistreatment of animals, whether it be killing them for fun (sometimes even food), conducting experiments on them, and imprisoning them. I promise you if you look hard enough you'll find an organization against it.
So since your argument is based upon the basis that humans in general tend to think that experiments on animals is not cruel, or imprisoning animals is not cruel, you argument stands on shaky grounds because I'm plenty sure there are quite a few humans who feel those are things are.
If these people see those things you listed as cruelty as well as the "consent" thing, there is no hypocrisy, and they are being consistant.
That's a pretty good argument however, it falls on the idea that ALL humans believe in those things, or don't get "up tight" when those things happen to animals.
There are many human organizations against the mistreatment of animals, whether it be killing them for fun (sometimes even food), conducting experiments on them, and imprisoning them. I promise you if you look hard enough you'll find an organization against it.
So since your argument is based upon the basis that humans in general tend to think that experiments on animals is not cruel, or imprisoning animals is not cruel, you argument stands on shaky grounds because I'm plenty sure there are quite a few humans who feel those are things are.
If these people see those things you listed as cruelty as well as the "consent" thing, there is no hypocrisy, and they are being consistant.