Wait, in the previous post I say that changing the definition won't accomplish much to change the opinion of such people so we shouldn't waste effort on it, in response to a post where you claim a primary motivation for changing the definition should be how others view furry because the definition is somehow broke for some of them. How does that make me the one that should get over it, if I am the one saying move on? It also still doesn't explain how it would help with any of the groups, or why we should waste time and other issues on it when you haven't even suggested why it is the definition that is broken in the first place.
Wait, in the previous post I say that changing the definition won't accomplish much to change the opinion of such people so we shouldn't waste effort on it, in response to a post where you claim a primary motivation for changing the definition should be how others view furry because the definition is somehow broke for some of them. How does that make me the one that should get over it, if I am the one saying move on? It also still doesn't explain how it would help with any of the groups, or why we should waste time and other issues on it when you haven't even suggested why it is the definition that is broken in the first place.