Also, you deserve something a little less flippant, but whether or not you agree with my definition is beside the point, because you are doing what I hoped for. You are providing your own definition, but more than that, you have illustrated a thought process behind that definition other than "that's the way it is." You're thinking about furry, not furries. Seriously, thank you for having the balls to share your opinion, and put your name next to it. And keep with the submitting, both news and articles, and especially reviews; your contribution list puts mine to shame.
I even liked your analysis of Kistelli, over in the comments on my article. Sex, death and foxes! Fantastic!
Godd bless, don't let the anonymous cowards get you down, and have fun!
Also, you deserve something a little less flippant, but whether or not you agree with my definition is beside the point, because you are doing what I hoped for. You are providing your own definition, but more than that, you have illustrated a thought process behind that definition other than "that's the way it is." You're thinking about furry, not furries. Seriously, thank you for having the balls to share your opinion, and put your name next to it. And keep with the submitting, both news and articles, and especially reviews; your contribution list puts mine to shame.
I even liked your analysis of Kistelli, over in the comments on my article. Sex, death and foxes! Fantastic!
Godd bless, don't let the anonymous cowards get you down, and have fun!