Or maybe they're trying to segregate sex crimes from physical crimes? I mean, if you read on someone's record "animal abuse" people are all going to assume they had sex with it unless those are separate terms.
I mean if we did that for humans, and made the crime of "rape" fall under "assault" everyone would assume the person who was charged with assault committed rape.
Or maybe they're trying to segregate sex crimes from physical crimes? I mean, if you read on someone's record "animal abuse" people are all going to assume they had sex with it unless those are separate terms.
I mean if we did that for humans, and made the crime of "rape" fall under "assault" everyone would assume the person who was charged with assault committed rape.