Not at all! As far as I'm concerned the essay I linked and a couple others have already said what had to be said on the social side, and your article takes well into account the motivations of the people behind the art. I look forward for more analisys of the art like yours. What I'm annoyed at are other people who in the past criticized furry art by pretending it was just Disney spinoffs, and that the fetishism factor and the social oddities behind it were unexplainable anomalies which hindered good art... when it was actually the opposite.
Not at all! As far as I'm concerned the essay I linked and a couple others have already said what had to be said on the social side, and your article takes well into account the motivations of the people behind the art. I look forward for more analisys of the art like yours. What I'm annoyed at are other people who in the past criticized furry art by pretending it was just Disney spinoffs, and that the fetishism factor and the social oddities behind it were unexplainable anomalies which hindered good art... when it was actually the opposite.