I used that there were roughly 4000 people at Anthrocon in 2010, not 20,000. If assuming those people had the same chances as the general public, since the figure of one person per 20,000 is per year, not for whole lifetime, then that means there is a 20% chance in one year than an attendant would be a victim. Or in other words like what I said in the previous post, 20% chance in one year means you would expect one person in 5 years. If you want to included murders in addition to murder victims, then you would probably have roughly twice that many people showing up the news.
I only use Anthrocon number as an example, since it is a very straightforward, easy to picture, conservative number of people who could be identified as furry to a reasonable degree.
I used that there were roughly 4000 people at Anthrocon in 2010, not 20,000. If assuming those people had the same chances as the general public, since the figure of one person per 20,000 is per year, not for whole lifetime, then that means there is a 20% chance in one year than an attendant would be a victim. Or in other words like what I said in the previous post, 20% chance in one year means you would expect one person in 5 years. If you want to included murders in addition to murder victims, then you would probably have roughly twice that many people showing up the news.
I only use Anthrocon number as an example, since it is a very straightforward, easy to picture, conservative number of people who could be identified as furry to a reasonable degree.