Even if people agreed exactly with your definition of furry and anthropomorphism, there is still a lot of room for interpretation. Is a movie supposed to win because it has the highest "furry quotient" or if not, then how much do you weight how furry it is vs. what you think of the quality? Is a good, but sort of furry movie supposed to beat a very furry movie that is disliked? What about when it starts getting closer: with a slight better, but slightly less furry movie vs. a slightly more furry but slightly worse movie? And even if people agreed exactly on how furry every entry is, there will be difference in opinion on what the cutoff for not furry enough. And that is all when assuming people agree on how furry things are, when obviously there are some huge differences in opinion about.
Even if people agreed exactly with your definition of furry and anthropomorphism, there is still a lot of room for interpretation. Is a movie supposed to win because it has the highest "furry quotient" or if not, then how much do you weight how furry it is vs. what you think of the quality? Is a good, but sort of furry movie supposed to beat a very furry movie that is disliked? What about when it starts getting closer: with a slight better, but slightly less furry movie vs. a slightly more furry but slightly worse movie? And even if people agreed exactly on how furry every entry is, there will be difference in opinion on what the cutoff for not furry enough. And that is all when assuming people agree on how furry things are, when obviously there are some huge differences in opinion about.