On that note being you have the right to be offended at FA's decision concerning this, and they have every right to be offended at the middle men pay pal accounts, but forcing them to try and change their decisions based on their risk of offense would be offensive of their rights to make those decisions as controversial as they are.
After all PayAlert "spoke", FA "spoke", you may not like what they said but they said it.
While I agree with you on the fact that I believe cub porn in and of itself is harmless it all comes down to what people see fursonas as.
To some "Their is no pipe" meaning the character they create is nothing more then an illusion that they congered up and offline they are completely different. To others it's an avatar of oneself and an extension of one's being. Those in the later group will tend to make the link between cub porn and actual offense.
I personally have done both over my online history, so I can see things from the perspective of both, and usually, as with most controversial topics, both sides a little incorrect on one thing, while being correct in other cases.
On that note being you have the right to be offended at FA's decision concerning this, and they have every right to be offended at the middle men pay pal accounts, but forcing them to try and change their decisions based on their risk of offense would be offensive of their rights to make those decisions as controversial as they are.
After all PayAlert "spoke", FA "spoke", you may not like what they said but they said it.
While I agree with you on the fact that I believe cub porn in and of itself is harmless it all comes down to what people see fursonas as.
To some "Their is no pipe" meaning the character they create is nothing more then an illusion that they congered up and offline they are completely different. To others it's an avatar of oneself and an extension of one's being. Those in the later group will tend to make the link between cub porn and actual offense.
I personally have done both over my online history, so I can see things from the perspective of both, and usually, as with most controversial topics, both sides a little incorrect on one thing, while being correct in other cases.