I wouldn't call a 17-year-old a "child", but they do fall under the definition of what will now be banned at FA.
However, I think his point was more that one exists in real life and so can be harmed, and one does not.
More information about formatting options
I wouldn't call a 17-year-old a "child", but they do fall under the definition of what will now be banned at FA.
However, I think his point was more that one exists in real life and so can be harmed, and one does not.