You persist in being deliberately obtuse, since there is nothing in my statement to even suggest that conclusion. Pornography, the general as well as specifically child pornography, is not a valid form of artistic expression, as it would require being able to inspire or move the viewer's intellect or emotions as opposed to simply stimulating his glans. And, as already noted, CP's only purpose, regardless of whether it's a photo or a drawing, to get the intended viewer hot and excited over children.
You persist in being deliberately obtuse, since there is nothing in my statement to even suggest that conclusion. Pornography, the general as well as specifically child pornography, is not a valid form of artistic expression, as it would require being able to inspire or move the viewer's intellect or emotions as opposed to simply stimulating his glans. And, as already noted, CP's only purpose, regardless of whether it's a photo or a drawing, to get the intended viewer hot and excited over children.