"You're saying that drawing parallels between the functions of two objects proves their equivalence for all intents and purposes. I'm drawing a similar analogy to show how fallacious this reasoning is. Now you're saying that what I said is "nothing at all like what [you] said"."
And it isn't.
"Please, tell me... how is it different? Apparently if it falls to me to prove that furry cub art and child pornography are different, then by the same burden of proof it is YOUR responsibility to show how my example differs from yours."
That's already been done throughout the course of this discussion.
"You're saying that drawing parallels between the functions of two objects proves their equivalence for all intents and purposes. I'm drawing a similar analogy to show how fallacious this reasoning is. Now you're saying that what I said is "nothing at all like what [you] said"."
And it isn't.
"Please, tell me... how is it different? Apparently if it falls to me to prove that furry cub art and child pornography are different, then by the same burden of proof it is YOUR responsibility to show how my example differs from yours."
That's already been done throughout the course of this discussion.