No, you're playing games by ignoring the rest of the statement. Both virtual and real child pornography (the former meaning drawings, etc, and the latter meaning photos, just so that there's no confusion as to what the word 'real' means) serve to visually excite the pedophile in possession of them; therefore, to all intents and purposes there is no real difference to them. Both are vile; one moreso than the other.
No, you're playing games by ignoring the rest of the statement. Both virtual and real child pornography (the former meaning drawings, etc, and the latter meaning photos, just so that there's no confusion as to what the word 'real' means) serve to visually excite the pedophile in possession of them; therefore, to all intents and purposes there is no real difference to them. Both are vile; one moreso than the other.