Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

No love lost, to me it just a typical smut peddler ripping off other smut peddler. Sounds like the deal breaker was child porn more likely pissing off artist for work posted without permission. Sorry folk you may want to read Christopher Handley case which set up a precedent by the court in affirming previsions of the PROTECT Act prohibiting distribution or possession of "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting. Cub porn is a despicable loophole.

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.