Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

No I wouldn't. The argument is that its depicting children sexually. It doesn't matter that a real child wasn't used to make it. And while I'm not saying this happens every time so don't condemn me for saying it, but sometimes simply viewing child pornography, even if its in furry form, Might lead to other things. You know what I'm talking about.

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.