I don't understand why a state would need such a registry. If California wants people to have registry, I'd think the system is already in place. Access to the criminal justice system with the web allows people to look up criminal history. If someone wants to look up if another has abused animals in the past, then there is no logic. Even if a person shows ID, they're not going to check, especially since the customer is probably paying for a pet.
This would be yet another waste of taxpayer money. Do we expect anything different from California. Recently a US Senate candidate from California suggested the state should declare bankruptcy, which states can't perform. However, municipalities in California can perform bankruptcy.
Seriously, this is how people in California want their state ran in regards to the people they've elected?
I don't understand why a state would need such a registry. If California wants people to have registry, I'd think the system is already in place. Access to the criminal justice system with the web allows people to look up criminal history. If someone wants to look up if another has abused animals in the past, then there is no logic. Even if a person shows ID, they're not going to check, especially since the customer is probably paying for a pet.
This would be yet another waste of taxpayer money. Do we expect anything different from California. Recently a US Senate candidate from California suggested the state should declare bankruptcy, which states can't perform. However, municipalities in California can perform bankruptcy.
Seriously, this is how people in California want their state ran in regards to the people they've elected?