Your point was that my moral argument was on slippery ground if I was vegan. My reply was that the moral argument is consistent whether or not the person making it was vegan. I additionally pointed out that those trying to make a moral argument for bestiality/zoophilia have tried using both sides of the moral argument in regards to consent to their advantage, and is inconsistent. So I feel no need to continue this line. I'm not going to be dragged into something that doesn't apply.
Your point was that my moral argument was on slippery ground if I was vegan. My reply was that the moral argument is consistent whether or not the person making it was vegan. I additionally pointed out that those trying to make a moral argument for bestiality/zoophilia have tried using both sides of the moral argument in regards to consent to their advantage, and is inconsistent. So I feel no need to continue this line. I'm not going to be dragged into something that doesn't apply.