You display your own appalling levels of both in what you have written here, mister too-callow to sign your name to your reply.
Cordite has a most valid point-
In mathematics and physics, there are too many variables in something as common as birdstrikes, (The correct term in aviation,) to trust to computer or paper simulations to determine if a canopy will withstand the impact at speed and prevent a disaster from happening.
You clearly have neither real world experience in mechanics or science, nor the guts to stand up for your convictions and admit to who you are.
So your opinion is slightly amusing in its naiivete, but otherwise meaningless.
Stupidity? Ignorance?
You display your own appalling levels of both in what you have written here, mister too-callow to sign your name to your reply.
Cordite has a most valid point-
In mathematics and physics, there are too many variables in something as common as birdstrikes, (The correct term in aviation,) to trust to computer or paper simulations to determine if a canopy will withstand the impact at speed and prevent a disaster from happening.
You clearly have neither real world experience in mechanics or science, nor the guts to stand up for your convictions and admit to who you are.
So your opinion is slightly amusing in its naiivete, but otherwise meaningless.
-Iron Badger-