Why is there so much hullabaloo about this article anyways? I've read it three times now, and frankly... It's nothing much.
If anything the article seemed to boil down to, "Hey, wait a minute! I was told Furries were some sort of bizarre sexual fetish freaks! How come their con doesn't look like it?!?"
Of course he wasn't actually at the con.
Why is there so much hullabaloo about this article anyways? I've read it three times now, and frankly... It's nothing much.
If anything the article seemed to boil down to, "Hey, wait a minute! I was told Furries were some sort of bizarre sexual fetish freaks! How come their con doesn't look like it?!?"
Of course he wasn't actually at the con.